Arrives knowing how to assess against a standard. The healthcare-specific learning is what the standard should contain when it has to travel between countries.
Our own project · Meridian Hospital Group is a constructed operator; the instrument and its figures are real
Meridian Hospital Group · Group
Director of Standards
Owns the sale gate, holds the published criteria, and can refuse a disposal. The one seat that must not report to the chief executive.
Chapter 1 · Group
What they actually do
Defines what best in class means for this group, in a form that can be scored, and grades every site against it in its own place. Publishes what each site cannot meet and why, rather than quietly lowering the bar to fit.
And holds the gate. A hospital goes to market only when it passes, and the passing is this role's judgement against criteria set in advance. Reports to the board, not to the executive whose sale it may block.
- Answers for
- Whether a site meets the group standard in its own place, and whether it is ready to sell.
- Can actually move
- The published criteria, the grading, and a veto over disposal. Reports to the board rather than to the chief executive.
- Sees the cost of
- The gap between what was promised and what is delivered, which is the only seat that does.
Chapter 2 · From arriving to moving on
Growth in the role
A relatively new kind of seat, assembled from quality, clinical governance and audit backgrounds. Its authority comes from independence rather than from hierarchy.
Turning aspirations into things a stranger could score the same way twice. Most of the first year is deleting criteria that cannot be tested.
The role only means something the first time it costs the company money. Everything before that is preparation for that meeting.
Natural progression into non-executive work or into the bodies that write standards for everybody, which is the wider version of the same job.
Chapter 3 · And how it is usually settled
Where this role is in conflict
This seat exists to be in conflict. A standards role with no conflicts is not being used.
-
With The patient
Over Nothing, if the criteria are written properly- Why it is structural
- This is the one group seat whose entire purpose is to represent a definition of good that outlives the current quarter.
- How it is settled today
- The risk is not conflict but capture: criteria written in provider terms quietly stop representing the patient at all, and nobody notices because the scores still look rigorous.
-
With The Chief Executive
Over Refusing a disposal- Why it is structural
- The executive is measured on realising value. This role can stop it. That is the designed tension and the reason for the reporting line.
- How it is settled today
- By the board. If it is ever settled by the chief executive, the role has ceased to exist in substance while continuing to appear on the chart.
-
With Hospital Directors
Over Being graded in their own place- Why it is structural
- Site leadership would prefer to be measured against what their place allows. The standard's value is that it states what cannot be met and why, rather than adjusting until everyone passes.
- How it is settled today
- By publishing the unmet elements alongside the score, which protects the site from an unfair comparison and the group from a flattering one.
Chapter 4 · Actor one
How this reaches the patient
Indirect and unusually powerful. This seat decides what the organisation counts as good, and therefore what every level below will optimise toward.
If the criteria are written in provider terms, length of stay, occupancy, cost per case, the patient's episode stays invisible. If they are written against the whole episode, from first symptom to functional again, the definition of best in class finally includes the part the patient is actually judging.
Chapter 5 · Actor two
How this reaches the rest of the provider
The only role that can tell the group it has not finished. Everywhere else in the structure the incentive points toward declaring success.
Its independence is the load-bearing element. Move this seat under the chief executive and the gate becomes a preference, the criteria drift toward whatever the current site can meet, and the business model quietly becomes the thing it claims not to be.
Every role, side by side
The full hierarchy, and where accountability and control come apart.
Back to people and hierarchy